Descartes and Plato Essay

Explain both of descartes Arguments for the creative activity of God Descartes verification of Gods existence comes from his third meditation and is found on three radicals. He argues that ignorant idea exists within us, the fictitious or invented ideas ar a result of our own imagination and adventitious ideas result from our experiences in the world. Descartes said, the idea of God is innate and can non be invented. Descartes presents some railway lines that lead to his conclusion.The first argument is that nonhing can result to something and the cause of an idea will always progress to a evening gown reality because the idea must have an objective reality. He argues that if an individual have God, then the idea has an infinite objective reality and therefore, the individual cannot be the cause of the idea, because he is not infinite or a perfect being or he doesnt have enough formal reality. Its only a perfect and infinite being who can be the cause of the idea. Therefor e, God as an infinite reality must exist. A perfect being, is benevolent and good implying that God is benevolent and would not deceive or allow making errors without giving a way of correcting the errors.The second argument Descartes gives is based on the premise that I exist, and my existence must have a cause. He gives the only thinkable causes are my existence, existence of something less perfect than God and existence of God. Out of this Descartes argues that if I had created myself, I would have created myself perfect and that if my existence have a cause, then it doesnt solve the problem. If Im not an independent being, then I would need the sustenance of another being. And that the perfection in me could not acquire from a less perfect being.Therefore God exists. Descartes second proof of Gods existence is based on the fifth meditation on essence of material objects and its called the ontological argument. Descartes identifies remote objects that can either be distinct an d clear or obscure and confused. Descartes argues that without any sure friendship of existence of a supreme and perfect being it would be impossible to have any authorization of any truth. Descartes defined God as an infinitely perfect being and that perfection will embarrass existence. Meaning therefore, God exists.Explain the Allegory of the Cave and relate it to Platos metaphysical and epistemological theory The fiction of weaken is about pris geniusrs who have spent their lives chained to the wall of a cave and facing the wall. The prisoners are watching shadows cast on the wall by objects passing in front of the fire fuck them, and they start to attribute the forms of these shadows. It is a figurative show of how a man is trapped in the incantation of material existence and how he can free himself from such trappings by philosophical thoughts of personalised and social awareness through constant self examination.These shadows are the close the prisoners can get to rea lity. When the one who actually is able to free himself from the cave, returns back to the cave to tell his fellow man about the world outside the cave he is ridiculed for his free thoughts by the ones not knowing the real truth yet. Thats how a philosopher feels, he is like the prisoner who has freed himself from the cave and realizes that shadows on the wall are not the reality of things in life but merely shadows.This allegory of the cave is related to Platos theory of Metaphysics and Epistemology. Seen as an epistemological account, it attempts to determine the importance of ideas which we can only comprehend through reason resulting from our experiences from the physical world. The allegory of the cave is a philosophers effort to enlighten the society which can be seen as prisoners, imprisoned by their dark ignorance. The cave could represent our daily experiences and how we always accept the dictates of the society without questioning them.